Len Noe is an ethical augmented hacker and cybersecurity professional living with 11 sub-dermal microchips implanted in his body. What sounds like science fiction is already real, accessible, and being purchased online today. In this episode of Happy Hour with HatchMan, we go beyond the shock factor and into the bigger questions. What do these implants actually do? Why would someone choose to augment their body with technology? And where does this all lead? We talk about: ⢠How Len uses his implants in real life ⢠What âtranshumanâ really means ⢠The ethics of human augmentation ⢠Neuralink vs. Synchron and the current state of brain-computer interfaces ⢠DNA editing and the possibility of eliminating disease ⢠Legal gray areas around implanted tech ⢠Government involvement, deepfakes, dopamine, and the future of identity Itâs about understanding where technology is already taking us and deciding what kind of future we want to participate in. Follow Len, grab his book, and explore the links mentioned in the episode.
What happens when the future isnât theoretical anymore?
In this episode of Happy Hour with HatchMan, Braden Hatch sits down with Len Noe, an ethical augmented hacker, cybersecurity professional, and speaker who is living with 11 sub-dermal microchips implanted in his body.
These implants are not experimental lab projects. They are real, they are available, and people are already using them.
We break down:
What implanted microchips in the human body actually do
How RFID and NFC implants work in everyday life
What âtranshumanâ really means
Neuralink vs. Synchron and where brain-computer interfaces stand today
DNA editing and the possibility of eliminating disease
Ethical concerns around body modification
Privacy risks and cybersecurity implications
Legal gray areas created by implanted tech
Government involvement and regulation
Deepfakes, dopamine, and digital identity
Len also shares the moment he turned his life around, the pushback he has faced, and why technological change almost always meets resistance.
This conversation is not about shock value. It is about understanding what is already here and thinking critically about where it is going.